this politico bit alleges a Clinton-Fox pact that most of us’d prolly find plenty believable… it’s just another part of the horrid, mistake-free grandeur that has been the ‘Hillary’ campaign so far.
i guess that’s what happens when you’re an ex-preznit’s wife and an odds-on favorite. i was bemoaning obama’s lack of message to my da recently when he reminded me that all the money in the world cannot buy you the wherewithal to know whom and what one should spend it on. for example, you can dump millions on Iowanese luminaries and GOTV people, but without experience, it’s impossible to know “who’s bullshit and who’s not” (Da’s words.) that’s very true, of course. only experience running national campaigns can hip you to those you need (and those you needn’t) in your organization.
but the other thing is that Obama has been way too lax about HC’s war record. i guess he’s picking his spot? but maybe Dems don’t even care that Hillary was a hawk until 2006?
anybody watching the debate today? look for a pile-on on Hillary, and look for HC to protect her hold on the center.